-
Santa Gertrudis
- 5 stars Rating: 88
141 votes total - (38)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HoopsCoach said...
Stopped reading after #2. Terrible post.
Nebraska, A&M, and Missouri left because THEY were greedy and had penis envy. Colorado left because they thought UT, OU, OSU, TT, and A&M were headed to the Pac 10 and they wanted to make sure they got in instead of Baylor.
For your 2nd point, adding WVU and TCU didn't make the conference weaker. It's not like they added Maryland and Rutgers.
Santa Gertrudis
- 5 stars Rating: 88
141 votes total - (38)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
detly wepun said...
Having a 14-team, split division conference has allowed the SEC to avoid cannibalization of its best teams and have several members with 10-win seasons. The Big 12's round-robin schedule mathematically means it's possible for only 1 conference member to post 10 wins. The critical question is how important are 10-win seasons when it comes to post season rankings.
The other question comes down to "who" can the Big 12 add that brings more value in terms of both revenues and fan interest. Texas should've learned enough with U of H in the old SWC to avoid city colleges like Louisville or Cincinatti just to add bodies. And, IMO most conference championship games are generally lackluster, and only provide opportunities for NC contenders to get knocked off by opponents that aren't in the NC consideration.
JeezGuy
- 5 stars Rating: 87
3149 votes total - Relax man.... Its just a joke
- (5116)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars



thoughts on the University of Texas Men's Athletic Dept