-
Jexes23
- 5 stars Rating: 85
1688 votes total - Bad Ass
- (961)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Codaxx said...
I really don't understand this thread. Texas produced a ton of wrs. Multiple first round kids.Then Quan and Shipley the older. In the end it is a 2 year dry spell. In that spell, we have one of the better freshman wrs is the country, Young Shipley. So what changed? QB instabilty and 2 offensive systems in 2 yrs. Maybe it is not that Texas is a blackhole for WRs, perhaps it is a reversion to the mean. Maybe it is simply a toxic combination of the last 2 yrs. Yound QBs throwing to young WRs.Generally, you can have one or the other and succeed. Having both is an issue. I am not ready to say that Texas has issues developing kids at wr yet
This post was edited by mcb0703 on 5/6/2012 at 5:38 AM
-
mcb0703 said...
While I respect the positive outlook, facts speak for themselves when it comes to WR development...during Mack's time @ Texas, he's had 1 WR drafted in the 1st round (not multiple)...& if you review each recruiting class & then review the corresponding NFL draft 4-5 years later, the lack of Texas WR's drafted is glaring
To date, Mack's had 5 WR's drafted into the NFL while HC @ Texas - Williams, Shipley, McGarity, Thomas, Sweed...a few others have rec'd FA contracts
http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/all-time-nfl-draft.html
-
wbrom42 said...
I find it hard to believe that the evaluations were so far off. I feel the same way about the OL position.
I find it harder to believe that all of the other top programs that offered them were wrong as well.
There is no way the dozens of WRs and OL that Texas recruited after the NC would have all flopped at other programs.
The answer the OP is looking for is in the Texas Media Guide under the coaching section. Notice the turnover on the offensive side of the ball. It can't all be on Madden either because plenty of defensive players flourished.
The only other program that accepted such mediocrity on the offensive side of the ball that I can recall is at FSU with Bowden's son at OC. The one difference was that Texas had a few elite players that transcended poor scheme and coaching.
If Mack had his current mindset in 2001 he would be on his way to being considered one of the greatest coaches of all time. I wouldn't trade the success of the program during that timeframe, but I think it could have been much better.
-
Codaxx said...
i am clearly in the minority, but much of this seems to be frustration over the past couple yrs. WR havent developed the way we would like. There is clearly blame to be doled out amongst the individual wrs and coaches. I just wonder where Mike Davis would be had COlt been here in 2010 and not the rotating undeclassmen at QB. You brought up a great point about the defense still producing. It actually got me thinking about why there seems to be a massive divide between the success of the 2 areas. Defense seems to have over come the hurdles placed in front of them. The difference maybe simple. Defense has seemed to have older character guys to lead them. Achos come to mind. The last 2 yrs there has not been a player with enough credibilty to hold that side accountable. Coach's share in the to blame, but every unit needs a leader.
-
Codaxx said...
I have to admit I am a lazy man, but it would be interesting to see wrs developed under Mack to other similar programs across the country. I have a feeling it is not a as bad as people are thinking. 09_ shipley all-conference 08_ shipley 2nd team 07_ quan cosby honorable mention PR/KR 06- limas sweed- all-conference.. Pittman honorable mention 05-Pittman- honorable mention wr 04- scaife. TE 1st team (not wrs though) 03- Roy Williams - 1st team
That doesnt seem to me to be a history of poor production. I believe that pts to a recent issue, which probably puts more emphasis on erratic QB than overall development. If this post was about the OL, you would find me taking a completely different tone
-
wbrom42 said...
At a university like UT you don't go years and years without certain positions being drafted. It's pretty simple.
I'm not trying to flame you either. It was poor player development and scheme. There are a number of OCs around the country who would've given their right nut for half the talent UT had from 06-present.
-
Alan Trubow
- 5 stars Rating: 95
2537 votes total - (4907)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
mcb0703 said...
Mack Brown's been @ Texas since 1998...you can count on 1 hand the total number of WR's drafted since he arrived
Duane Akina's had 5 DB's drafted in the 1st round, plus numerous others drafted in later rounds...I'm not asking for the same WR development as DB development, but to think Akina's put as many DB's in the 1st round as ALL WR's drafted over the same period is telling
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by horn4life1 on 5/7/2012 at 1:54 PM
-
mcb0703 said...
Mack Brown's been @ Texas since 1998...you can count on 1 hand the total number of WR's drafted since he arrived
Duane Akina's had 5 DB's drafted in the 1st round, plus numerous others drafted in later rounds...I'm not asking for the same WR development as DB development, but to think Akina's put as many DB's in the 1st round as ALL WR's drafted over the same period is telling
ChampKind
- 5 stars Rating: 91
2680 votes total - Whaaaammmmy! !
- (3321)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Codaxx said...
First off Akina is one of the best in the business. Our success at DB is an outlier. Basically, every position will fall short on Texas and most teams when compared to Akina. Secondly, 4 DBs start on defense. Not the case for WR. Take out last 2 yrs and the numbers are 9 to 5. Given 4-5 DBs playing and generally 2-3 wrs the numbers are not pari, but reasonable. My biggest concern is that it is not purely evaluation. I wish it was because that is an easy fix. Until Texas develops an o-line and reasonable QB play, I doubt the last 2 yrs of frustration at WR will end. Reports are of progress on the entire offense are at least promising.
-
sundancekid
- 4 stars Rating: 76
3149 votes total - (3164)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Codaxx said...
Just the nature of the game. Akina is really that good as a DB coach. There are reasons why they call them great coaches, one is they are rare. I think way too much is placed on NFL draft picks. Look at Oregon and BSU. Despite the complaints on this thread, Texas has had a very good track record on offense. I would just like to see Texas near that production again. I think if the running game truly develops, the QBs and WRs will magically start to look a lot more talented.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3



Why have we had such tough luck with receivers?