Online Now 828

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

On this Board 502
Record: 4156 (12/1/2012)

Online now 819
Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

6th Street

The place for off topic discussion on Hookem

Reply

Why have we had such tough luck with receivers?

  • If it really was S&C then we ought to show drastic improvement this year. In all honesty I feel good about our depth and talent at all positions except receiver. I see Shipley and whole bunch of questions. I would love to be proven wrong, but I'm not seeing it.

    signature image

    www.thecorraliban.net

    Jexes23

  • I really don't understand this thread. Texas produced a ton of wrs. Multiple first round kids.Then Quan and Shipley the older. In the end it is a 2 year dry spell. In that spell, we have one of the better freshman wrs is the country, Young Shipley. So what changed? QB instabilty and 2 offensive systems in 2 yrs. Maybe it is not that Texas is a blackhole for WRs, perhaps it is a reversion to the mean. Maybe it is simply a toxic combination of the last 2 yrs. Yound QBs throwing to young WRs.Generally, you can have one or the other and succeed. Having both is an issue. I am not ready to say that Texas has issues developing kids at wr yet

    Codaxx

  • Bad evaluation, bad development; bad scheme. Since 2009 we've put two wide outs into the league. and only have one certain pick on campus today. Now we are viewed as a run first team where receivers go to die. It probably will take a couple of years until Ash and Brewer fully grow into top quality college QB's that we change that rap.

    gordosan

  • Codaxx said...

    I really don't understand this thread. Texas produced a ton of wrs. Multiple first round kids.Then Quan and Shipley the older. In the end it is a 2 year dry spell. In that spell, we have one of the better freshman wrs is the country, Young Shipley. So what changed? QB instabilty and 2 offensive systems in 2 yrs. Maybe it is not that Texas is a blackhole for WRs, perhaps it is a reversion to the mean. Maybe it is simply a toxic combination of the last 2 yrs. Yound QBs throwing to young WRs.Generally, you can have one or the other and succeed. Having both is an issue. I am not ready to say that Texas has issues developing kids at wr yet

    While I respect the positive outlook, facts speak for themselves when it comes to WR development...during Mack's time @ Texas, he's had 1 WR drafted in the 1st round (not multiple)...& if you review each recruiting class & then review the corresponding NFL draft 4-5 years later, the lack of Texas WR's drafted is glaring

    To date, Mack's had 5 WR's drafted into the NFL while HC @ Texas - Williams, Shipley, McGarity, Thomas, Sweed...a few others have rec'd FA contracts

    http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/all-time-nfl-draft.html

    This post was edited by mcb0703 on 5/6/2012 at 5:38 AM

    mcb0703

  • My bad I thought Limas was end of the 1st. It was second..

    Codaxx

  • Brian Ethridge said...

    Texas' S&C program was at fault as well.

    Baylor has WRs across the board in size, but they all can run.

    Wright, 5'10 195 4.41 Reese, 5'10 170 4.32 Williams, 6'3 205 4.48 Sampson, 6' 200 4.34 Goodley, 5'11 220 4.34 (likely Wright's replacement) Lee, 6'2 210 4.52

    That may have been part of it but I think poor evaluation and coaching was a bigger issue. Daryl Wyatt seems to be doing a better job. Texas may not end up with the best WR corps in the Big 12 but they are getting a bunch of kids that work well in the Boise system.

    Just to say it, one of the knocks on Wright beside his size was that he had trouble getting off the line.

    76-37-5

    ut755

  • mcb0703 said...

    While I respect the positive outlook, facts speak for themselves when it comes to WR development...during Mack's time @ Texas, he's had 1 WR drafted in the 1st round (not multiple)...& if you review each recruiting class & then review the corresponding NFL draft 4-5 years later, the lack of Texas WR's drafted is glaring

    To date, Mack's had 5 WR's drafted into the NFL while HC @ Texas - Williams, Shipley, McGarity, Thomas, Sweed...a few others have rec'd FA contracts

    http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/all-time-nfl-draft.html

    I have to admit I am a lazy man, but it would be interesting to see wrs developed under Mack to other similar programs across the country. I have a feeling it is not a as bad as people are thinking.
    09_ shipley all-conference
    08_ shipley 2nd team
    07_ quan cosby honorable mention PR/KR
    06- limas sweed- all-conference.. Pittman honorable mention
    05-Pittman- honorable mention wr
    04- scaife. TE 1st team (not wrs though)
    03- Roy Williams - 1st team

    That doesnt seem to me to be a history of poor production. I believe that pts to a recent issue, which probably puts more emphasis on erratic QB than overall development. If this post was about the OL, you would find me taking a completely different tone

    Codaxx

  • Is the success of a college football coach really measured by how many players go to the NFL? It seems to me that winning games, conference championships, bowl games and national championships, as well as the number of all conference and all american players would outrank that. Just look at all of the terrific college players who for one reason or another never impact the NFL. Do you really ding his college coach for that?

    "I've heard some of our fans say, 'We were always an SEC school. We just didn't know it," athletic director Bill Byrne said.

    Bevo52

  • I find it hard to believe that the evaluations were so far off. I feel the same way about the OL position.

    I find it harder to believe that all of the other top programs that offered them were wrong as well.

    There is no way the dozens of WRs and OL that Texas recruited after the NC would have all flopped at other programs.

    The answer the OP is looking for is in the Texas Media Guide under the coaching section. Notice the turnover on the offensive side of the ball. It can't all be on Madden either because plenty of defensive players flourished.

    The only other program that accepted such mediocrity on the offensive side of the ball that I can recall is at FSU with Bowden's son at OC. The one difference was that Texas had a few elite players that transcended poor scheme and coaching.

    If Mack had his current mindset in 2001 he would be on his way to being considered one of the greatest coaches of all time. I wouldn't trade the success of the program during that timeframe, but I think it could have been much better.

    wbrom42

  • wbrom42 said...

    I find it hard to believe that the evaluations were so far off. I feel the same way about the OL position.

    I find it harder to believe that all of the other top programs that offered them were wrong as well.

    There is no way the dozens of WRs and OL that Texas recruited after the NC would have all flopped at other programs.

    The answer the OP is looking for is in the Texas Media Guide under the coaching section. Notice the turnover on the offensive side of the ball. It can't all be on Madden either because plenty of defensive players flourished.

    The only other program that accepted such mediocrity on the offensive side of the ball that I can recall is at FSU with Bowden's son at OC. The one difference was that Texas had a few elite players that transcended poor scheme and coaching.

    If Mack had his current mindset in 2001 he would be on his way to being considered one of the greatest coaches of all time. I wouldn't trade the success of the program during that timeframe, but I think it could have been much better.

    i am clearly in the minority, but much of this seems to be frustration over the past couple yrs. WR havent developed the way we would like. There is clearly blame to be doled out amongst the individual wrs and coaches. I just wonder where Mike Davis would be had COlt been here in 2010 and not the rotating undeclassmen at QB. You brought up a great point about the defense still producing. It actually got me thinking about why there seems to be a massive divide between the success of the 2 areas. Defense seems to have over come the hurdles placed in front of them. The difference maybe simple. Defense has seemed to have older character guys to lead them. Achos come to mind. The last 2 yrs there has not been a player with enough credibilty to hold that side accountable. Coach's share in the to blame, but every unit needs a leader.

    Codaxx

  • Codaxx said...

    i am clearly in the minority, but much of this seems to be frustration over the past couple yrs. WR havent developed the way we would like. There is clearly blame to be doled out amongst the individual wrs and coaches. I just wonder where Mike Davis would be had COlt been here in 2010 and not the rotating undeclassmen at QB. You brought up a great point about the defense still producing. It actually got me thinking about why there seems to be a massive divide between the success of the 2 areas. Defense seems to have over come the hurdles placed in front of them. The difference maybe simple. Defense has seemed to have older character guys to lead them. Achos come to mind. The last 2 yrs there has not been a player with enough credibilty to hold that side accountable. Coach's share in the to blame, but every unit needs a leader.

    At a university like UT you don't go years and years without certain positions being drafted. It's pretty simple.

    I'm not trying to flame you either. It was poor player development and scheme. There are a number of OCs around the country who would've given their right nut for half the talent UT had from 06-present.

    wbrom42

  • Codaxx said...

    I have to admit I am a lazy man, but it would be interesting to see wrs developed under Mack to other similar programs across the country. I have a feeling it is not a as bad as people are thinking. 09_ shipley all-conference 08_ shipley 2nd team 07_ quan cosby honorable mention PR/KR 06- limas sweed- all-conference.. Pittman honorable mention 05-Pittman- honorable mention wr 04- scaife. TE 1st team (not wrs though) 03- Roy Williams - 1st team

    That doesnt seem to me to be a history of poor production. I believe that pts to a recent issue, which probably puts more emphasis on erratic QB than overall development. If this post was about the OL, you would find me taking a completely different tone

    I like your lens, I just can't wear it if I want to see clearly. By the way post is fine, if I have to say so myself. Go back and look at the number of recruits we have had at the position just since 2008. It is easy you'll find it on the official site. There has been a remarkable inability to transfer potential--i.e well regarded recruits--to top notch producers. Whoever said it is akin to a blackhole is saying exactly the truth. It really doesn't matter why it has happened.

    Some say it has been poor attitude; some entitlement; others lack of motivated players; etc. The issue is that it should not be. One of the great sayings about Bear Bryant was that; "he could use your own to beat his own." So coaching does have a great deal to do with how they turn out in your program.

    The responsibility of coaches is to hold the type of issues that have been fingered to be the root cause of the problem of production at the position to a minimum and maximize the bounty of recruiting. What's the point of great recruiting classes if we are just going to allow "reasons" to stop us from getting everything we can from them and making them better for themselves and their families?

    I remember that same thing was being said about the OL and running game in '08/'09 when the QB was getting killed and was also the leading rusher. Like you, today, a lot of people disagreed then as well. Played "Ostrich" and stuck their head in the sand. As it turned out, not only did we have a scheme issue, we also had all the other problems that was masqueraded by the two great years, '08 and '09 and the momentum from '05. It came home to roost in '10 and '11. In '11 for instance, Davis played like he was not the same person the year before, like he suddenly forgot who he was. We also lost some really good prospects because of "poor attitude". Well, that only happens when there is lack of structured accountability. Not just in football but anything including business.

    The encouraging thing is that the slate is clean. The new coaches we have are very hungry for success so I am guidedly optimistic. We have good players at the position right now and more is coming. We should find a way to use DJ's speed this year if someone has to throw him 500 balls everyday to get his hands to soften and I am glad there are more than 'Ship. This year should be one where the WOs really help the QB position unlike in some games this past year. By the way, I am also optimistic about this year and that it will get turned around like it has at other positions.

    horn4life1

  • Codaxx said...

    I really don't understand this thread. Texas produced a ton of wrs. Multiple first round kids.

    Define "multiple".

    signature image signature image

    pepper11

  • Actually 2009 offense was amazing for all the wrong reasons. I believe one of 2 or 3 offenses to actually have a higher success rate on passing situations than standard downs since the stats have been kept. That sort of leads to my pts about recent frustrations. They were able to do that, because of a great QB and an excellent WR corp. I am of the idea that it makes little sense to single out WR. The OL has been a mess for yrs. QB situation has been a disaster. Expecting wrs to flourish in that environment is like expecting to naturally grow grass in the Texas summer. It is pretty much a collective failure. Like watching the offense last year. It seemed no matter what happened there would be a breakdown. If OL blocked QB made a bad read or throw. IF OL and QB did the right thing, a ball was dropped. Until some unit is able to carry the load, I fear development on the side of the ball will continue to be poor

    Codaxx

  • wbrom42 said...

    At a university like UT you don't go years and years without certain positions being drafted. It's pretty simple.

    I'm not trying to flame you either. It was poor player development and scheme. There are a number of OCs around the country who would've given their right nut for half the talent UT had from 06-present.

    +1. Hard to put it any better than you did. I think this is the year we find out if it the issue is on someone's radar because it sure should be.

    horn4life1

  • not to flame thetopic, but Shipley was drafted in the 3rd round 2 yrs ago. So it really hasnt been that long since a Longhorn was drafted at WR

    Codaxx

  • Codaxx said...

    not to flame thetopic, but Shipley was drafted in the 3rd round 2 yrs ago. So it really hasnt been that long since a Longhorn was drafted at WR

    Mack Brown's been @ Texas since 1998...you can count on 1 hand the total number of WR's drafted since he arrived

    Duane Akina's had 5 DB's drafted in the 1st round, plus numerous others drafted in later rounds...I'm not asking for the same WR development as DB development, but to think Akina's put as many DB's in the 1st round as ALL WR's drafted over the same period is telling

    This post was edited by mcb0703 on 5/7/2012 at 3:58 AM

    mcb0703

  • I think you have to say it's about development as most of the guys were highly rated by everybody coming out of hgih school.

    You go through a couple bad years in a row at any position and you end up struggling. Happened at running back for a while and offensive line, too.

    Lead Writer Hookem.com___EMAIL:atrubow@statesman.com___TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/aTrubow

    Alan Trubow

  • mcb0703 said...

    Mack Brown's been @ Texas since 1998...you can count on 1 hand the total number of WR's drafted since he arrived

    Duane Akina's had 5 DB's drafted in the 1st round, plus numerous others drafted in later rounds...I'm not asking for the same WR development as DB development, but to think Akina's put as many DB's in the 1st round as ALL WR's drafted over the same period is telling

    Great viewpoint. Best of this post, imo. But why can't we ask the same of the WOs position coach? Similar money, same school, same quality athlete, just about same everything except quantity is a little less. This is exactly where this discussion is supposed to lead because it is all about productivity. We have been running a lot of 3 and 4 wides for years so we keep a fairly good number of receivers on-hand almost as much as we do DBs. think Coach Akina is exactly the standard. If he can take raw material with attributes and turn them into multimillion dollar DBs, then we should rightly expect the WOs coach to measure up. Same difference.

    During that span how many high draft choices from OU, OSU? I think OSU has 3 first rounders.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by horn4life1 on 5/7/2012 at 1:54 PM

    horn4life1

  • mcb0703 said...

    Mack Brown's been @ Texas since 1998...you can count on 1 hand the total number of WR's drafted since he arrived

    Duane Akina's had 5 DB's drafted in the 1st round, plus numerous others drafted in later rounds...I'm not asking for the same WR development as DB development, but to think Akina's put as many DB's in the 1st round as ALL WR's drafted over the same period is telling

    That's a sobering fact. Akina had 12 defensive backs drafted while only 5 receivers have been drafted since 1998. Ouch.

    ChampKind

  • ChampKind said...

    That's a sobering fact. Akina had 12 defensive backs drafted while only 5 receivers have been drafted since 1998. Ouch.

    First off Akina is one of the best in the business. Our success at DB is an outlier. Basically, every position will fall short on Texas and most teams when compared to Akina. Secondly, 4 DBs start on defense. Not the case for WR. Take out last 2 yrs and the numbers are 9 to 5. Given 4-5 DBs playing and generally 2-3 wrs the numbers are not pari, but reasonable. My biggest concern is that it is not purely evaluation. I wish it was because that is an easy fix. Until Texas develops an o-line and reasonable QB play, I doubt the last 2 yrs of frustration at WR will end. Reports are of progress on the entire offense are at least promising.

    Codaxx

  • Codaxx said...

    First off Akina is one of the best in the business. Our success at DB is an outlier. Basically, every position will fall short on Texas and most teams when compared to Akina. Secondly, 4 DBs start on defense. Not the case for WR. Take out last 2 yrs and the numbers are 9 to 5. Given 4-5 DBs playing and generally 2-3 wrs the numbers are not pari, but reasonable. My biggest concern is that it is not purely evaluation. I wish it was because that is an easy fix. Until Texas develops an o-line and reasonable QB play, I doubt the last 2 yrs of frustration at WR will end. Reports are of progress on the entire offense are at least promising.

    Well, I guess we have to agree to disagree on at least one issue. I am not sure why we can't have several great position coaches. Isn't that the basic goal of hiring good position coaches across the board? I do agree about the other positions contributing to success at receiver and vice versa.

    horn4life1

  • Just the nature of the game. Akina is really that good as a DB coach. There are reasons why they call them great coaches, one is they are rare. I think way too much is placed on NFL draft picks. Look at Oregon and BSU. Despite the complaints on this thread, Texas has had a very good track record on offense. I would just like to see Texas near that production again. I think if the running game truly develops, the QBs and WRs will magically start to look a lot more talented.

    Codaxx

  • It's Greg Davis and Kirk Bohls' fault.

    sundancekid

  • Codaxx said...

    Just the nature of the game. Akina is really that good as a DB coach. There are reasons why they call them great coaches, one is they are rare. I think way too much is placed on NFL draft picks. Look at Oregon and BSU. Despite the complaints on this thread, Texas has had a very good track record on offense. I would just like to see Texas near that production again. I think if the running game truly develops, the QBs and WRs will magically start to look a lot more talented.

    Well your premise is incorrect imo. I believe we have a number of great coaches right now. Including LB/DC; QB/OC; OL; DL; and DB.

    horn4life1