-
browncounty said...
Quite honestly, if Ash hadn't played a good bowl game, I would seriously be considering making Case my starter this year. Especially if my job was on the line. That's how close this is.
Ash can turn in some good games, but he can also freeze up for a 2-3 game skid. I wouldn't risk another season on this... had it not been for his good bowl game.
But another way to look at what I just said is - ok, so he had a good bowl game. So what?
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Black Shipley said...
Everyone wants to dismiss David Ash. Why? He was "third" on the depth chart while playing as a true freshman. Then in his sophmore year, Mack refused to name a clear QB and entertained the two-QB system crap which made Ash look over his shoulder every two seconds, hardly able to get comfortable. This season will be Ash's third and the ONLY one where going in he knows he is "the guy". Seems rather stupid for people to write off a player that is just now getting a legit opportunity to be the starter.
-
browncounty said...
While everything you said may be true in some sense I guess, here is the plain truth - Ash has indeed had the opportunity to show whether he's the man or not. Plenty of opportunity. He has turned in some good performances. He has also stunk up the joint.
Ash has not been slighted. If he were truly worthy of the unequivocal, clear role as starting QB, it would be easily his by now. But he just can't rise to that level.
Maybe he will next year, not saying he won't. But so far, no cigar.
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Michael Knight ●
- 4 stars Rating: 64
277 votes total - (126)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Black Shipley said...
Interesting. I make a statement. You try to explain it for me. Funny.
So when Ash led Texas to a win over Cal in the Holiday Bowl while Case was putting out transfer feelers he wasn't named the starter last Spring because he went "into shut down mode"?
Explain to me how that works.
Dude takes care of the ball, plays within himself, wins a bowl game and then goes into shut down mode so much so that a suspect (at best considering the transfer crap) Case McCoy is instantly back in the mix and taking half of the first team reps that Spring? Yeah, that's not "going into shut down mode" that's going into "this is some bullshit" mode.
But please, explain it to me.
-
pancholefty said...
From a historical point of view, Mack, has not been very good with QBs. So, it goes without saying that even if someone is doing better in practice he moves up the chart. This is why IMO we have negative feedback on the boards when it comes to QBs. We all remember Mack's handling of the position over the years, again, it has made us very leary of the decision making process of who gets to play and why.
-
cohorn said...
If Ash had played like an outstanding QB all season then Case woud never have been on the field except in a mopup role. this is fact whether he was only a little better than McCoy or 3 tmes as good.The fact that didn't happen is on Ash and no one else. If McCoy had not come in and played as well as he did in the games that he did play good Texas would not have played in the Holiday Bowl or the Alamo bowl. The haters need to give him credit for that. How pissed off would you haters be if Texas had not played in any bowl and we have come with in minutes of that happening. He's not the reason we won all the games we won. He wasn't even part of some, or most, of those victories, but why can't he be given credit for his accomplishments. only that.
-
browncounty said...
Quite honestly, if Ash hadn't played a good bowl game, I would seriously be considering making Case my starter this year. Especially if my job was on the line. That's how close this is.
Ash can turn in some good games, but he can also freeze up for a 2-3 game skid. I wouldn't risk another season on this... had it not been for his good bowl game.
But another way to look at what I just said is - ok, so he had a good bowl game. So what? Does that mean he won't go through another funk?
If we are serious about going to the hurry up, 2-back set, Case is not a bad bet anyway. For right or wrong, Case has confidence. Confidence is infectious. This is why our offense sometimes appears to have found another gear when Case comes in.
I would not describe Ash as exuding confidence. Ash does better when he snaps into "nothing to lose" mode. This usually happens after Case comes in and saves the day. But eventually Ash's nothing-to-lose attitude gives way to job security, and he then becomes overcautious, overthinking, and slips back into the funk.
This post was edited by Bandit18 on 3/12/2013 at 3:43 AM
-
Black Shipley said...
Interesting. I make a statement. You try to explain it for me. Funny.
So when Ash led Texas to a win over Cal in the Holiday Bowl while Case was putting out transfer feelers he wasn't named the starter last Spring because he went "into shut down mode"?
Explain to me how that works.
Dude takes care of the ball, plays within himself, wins a bowl game and then goes into shut down mode so much so that a suspect (at best considering the transfer crap) Case McCoy is instantly back in the mix and taking half of the first team reps that Spring? Yeah, that's not "going into shut down mode" that's going into "this is some bullshit" mode.
But please, explain it to me.
-
cohorn said...
If Ash had played like an outstanding QB all season then Case woud never have been on the field except in a mopup role. this is fact whether he was only a little better than McCoy or 3 tmes as good.The fact that didn't happen is on Ash and no one else. If McCoy had not come in and played as well as he did in the games that he did play good Texas would not have played in the Holiday Bowl or the Alamo bowl. The haters need to give him credit for that. How pissed off would you haters be if Texas had not played in any bowl and we have come with in minutes of that happening. He's not the reason we won all the games we won. He wasn't even part of some, or most, of those victories, but why can't he be given credit for his accomplishments. only that.
-
TeeDoe said...
Case was a 3-star recruit with offers from Florida, Florida St, Auburn, and A&M, among others. He's a decent qb. Him being our back up qb is more of an indictment of our qb situation than it is of Case. Saying he's a crappy qb who had a few lucky plays is not right.
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Shake Tiller ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
74 votes total - (135)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Black Shipley said...
He's a scrappy QB who had a few lucky plays.
I think he's a fine backup. Could we do better? Sure. Can he win a game in a pinch? I think so. Multiple games? I'm willing to give it a shot. If Ash gets hurt and Case stinks up the joint you can always throw Brewer in to see how he does. Brewer is just a couple plays away.
Another reason why Case would be a good backup this season? The new uptempo gameplan. I could see him being successful with a quick, short passing/screen game.
Not saying Brewer shouldn't get a shot at backup. He should. That's part of why I was pissed he didn't get reps in the first week. Still only takes a couple plays though...
-
browncounty said...
All I can conclude is you believe that everybody else should just be pushed to the back burner so that we don't huwt wittle Davy's feelwings.
David Ash has not earned unequivocal, head-and-shoulders, without a doubt, de facto numero uno, default QB at Texas. He has not earned it. Others can take some reps too.
But David is the #1, and it is his job, and he will be the man trotting out onto the field on opening day. Will he nail it down? I doubt it. He is lackluster, he is inconsistent, and he will prove that once again. The coaches know this.
So no, all eggs are not in the Ash basket, but he is deemed #1. And that's only for HIM to lose.
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TeeDoe said...
I'm with ya on Brewer. He seems to be the invisible man. Played well in last years spring game.
But as a side note, I think people underestimate how much Garrett Gilbert not working out cost us at the qb position. Didn't we lose Woods and Kinne to transfer because of him? And who knows what qb's we missed out on because they didn't want to ride the bench behind him. He impacted our qb recruiting until the 2012 recruiting class.
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4






Who do you think should be the back up QB??