Horns247 Board

It has to be Walsh, and this is the type of decision that could fracture a team if Gundy does it incorrectly.

Walsh makes a defense have to defend 11 on 11, Lunt does not.

I was impressed with him, but let's not forget that OSU ran for 270+ on us. We didn't exactly force OSU to put it all on his shoulders.

I think that whoever his OC will be next year, Monken or another, will have a lot to work with and he'll be deadly before it's all said and done.

I wonder if Wisconsin might be interested in his services at some point.

Lunt is supposed to be a very accurate passer. Given their running game and OL play, I don't think they really need a running QB. They might be a tougher out with a great passer.

This is all true. The point was that he wasn't consistently put in the third down situations we put Ash in, and we don't know how he would respond given that required level of execution. I think he'll be excellent in time and is darn good now.

I was pretty underwhelmed by Walsh. Not a very good passer at this point.

not sour grapes at all, just saying i see why gundy went with the other kid.

Why'd you take out the part about 67% completion percentage not being "all that great"?

They would have been undefeated and ranked coming into this game had Walsh played against Zona. I think quite a few OSU fans are telling themselves they would have won had Lunt played, and I think it's quite the opposite.