-
jmftexas said...
Astros should accumlate three #1 overall picks in a row. If they buy some good free agents when these guys make the majors they could be pretty good in a few years. I agree that this is correct route. Drayton's plan to put together a .team who he thought he could fool the fans into believeing had a chance by trading the farm system for mediocre players set back the franchise back ten years. I said it would at the time it was happening as well it was so ridiculous.
This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by austinr on 3/10/2013 at 9:51 AM
"Leadership is wisdom, courage and great carelessness of self"
-
austinr said...
It was ridiculous for anybody who knew anything about sports.....................be careful what you post about the drayton! The alphabet T-Ball boys think drayton was a great owner! (35 just agrees with anything they post) But to be fair being a Houston pro sports fan it is hard to identify a "good" owner because they've never had one..............organizations like the Rangers and Spurs continue to be their "daddy"!
-
Texas 35th said...
So what's your beef with the current ownership? That they moved the team to the AL? Your were educated on how that went down on the last Astros thread, so what else? How would you like the current front office to operate differently?
Again, it sucks for Astros fans wanting something to watch this season and next, but every single move they make should be around getting the farm system back up and running.
"Leadership is wisdom, courage and great carelessness of self"
-
austinr said...
For a long time....until the astros get a good owner and GM they will continue to lose 100 games. I'm concerned about the Rangers and the turmoil inside the front office. I just hope if they get off to a slow start they don't have a knee jerk reaction and fire Wash.....the good thing about the Rangers (unlike the astros) they've drafted well and have a lot of good prospects in their farm system. Since drayton fired his only good employee in 2004 the astros have been the laughing stock of professional sports with their player decisions.
Hayden Christensen - to merely call him wooden is an affront to puppets everywhere...
-
austinr said...
............I repeat you have a very short memory. But one more time I will recap:
-Change of leagues
-Attempting to change the name (until the outcry was so bad he stopped)
-Going cheap on the manager and firing the prior manager while never giving him a chance to win
-Firing multiple front office people not because they were not doing their job but because it was change
Bottom line crane wiped out 50 years of history (and yes some tradition) to make a buck................
.................now you list what you think he has done correctly
Chuckie Finster ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
2985 votes total - (1804)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
COACH CUTLIP ●
- 4 stars Rating: 69
2148 votes total - (1797)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Chuckie Finster said...
There's a reason that everyone who knows what they are talking about are excited about the Astros future, and the only people who are ragging on them are columnists who need a click.
They're going to be terrible this year. That's a given. But their future is as potentially bright as anyone in the league.
Signatures are stupid. You should block them.
-
austinr said...
............I repeat you have a very short memory. But one more time I will recap:
-Change of leagues
-Attempting to change the name (until the outcry was so bad he stopped)
-Going cheap on the manager and firing the prior manager while never giving him a chance to win
-Firing multiple front office people not because they were not doing their job but because it was change
Bottom line crane wiped out 50 years of history (and yes some tradition) to make a buck................
.................now you list what you think he has done correctly
-
Texas 35th said...
Yeah, nothing to see here. Really just more of the same vapor.
League change wasn't Crane's choice or preference. Was wither switch at a discount or don't get the team.
He didn't attempt to change the name, he merely did research and considered a change, which any smart businessman would do.
The manager today likely won't be the manager when the team is competitive again, so who cares? Maybe Porter does a great job and the team is competitive soon or maybe he's the stop gap before Biggio or Ausmus get the call. Either way, why would you care what happened to the last manager of the worst team in the league?
The old front office was a washed up, worn out, out of date, not in touch with reality group of blue hairs. They all needed to go, even the ones who had been there the longest.
I sincerely hope you're either younger than age 18 or older than age 70. Otherwise, your takes on the matter couldn't be any less relevant.
"Leadership is wisdom, courage and great carelessness of self"
-
close to jumping
- 4 stars Rating: 71
6748 votes total - (1843)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
close to jumping said...
Seeing these quoted posts from austinr just reminds me of how great the ignore feature is on this site, and how I wish some of you guys wouldn't quote consistent assbaggery in responses. The notion that the AL move is on Crane speaks to simple ignorance, but the claim that the new ownership is already worse than everyone in professional sports other than the Cowboys points to profound stupidity. Just let the guy shout into the ether on nonsense like that.
NLeininger ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
7129 votes total - (9650)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Sin Miedo ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
3468 votes total - (7624)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Chuckie Finster ●
- 5 stars Rating: 89
2985 votes total - (1804)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Sin Miedo ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
3468 votes total - (7624)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
NLeininger ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
7129 votes total - (9650)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
gordosan said...
The Washington Nationals approach. . Be the worst in baseball for three years and stock-pile #1 picks. It can work. Moving the Astro's AAA franchise to the Woodlands makes sense as well. I don't follow the Astro's closely enough to know how close they actually are. Bill James saying they will win 95 games in five years is pure sillyness though. They are just as likely to still be a .500 team at best. There are as many high first round busts in baseball as their are hits. My personal hope is that the Astro's and Rangers are battling for the A.L. championship yearly starting in 2015. Truly a win/win. Unfortunately, even with the massive spending mistakes that the Angels have made with Pujols and Hamilton, they have so much money that they can survive and still be a factor. The new deals that the Angels and Dodgers have signed put them close to Yankee territory. They can afford a salary of $160-180 mil. The Rangers are capped at $120-130. I don't know the Astro's money, but I suspect they are in Ranger territory best case.
The Angels have a good starting staff wrapped up for the next four years. They will sign Trout to a six year deal for less than $15 million a year. That's one of the top five players in the league. I hate all things L.A., so I wish they would go away; but they aren't.
NLeininger ●
- 5 stars Rating: 82
7129 votes total - (9650)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
close to jumping
- 4 stars Rating: 71
6748 votes total - (1843)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars

The Worst MLB Team