Online Now 644

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

On this Board 552
Record: 4156 (12/1/2012)

Online now 821
Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

6th Street

The place for off topic discussion on Hookem

Reply

Strip Joe Paterno of his wins.

  • GoHorns 1 said...

    The issue and concerns are the kids hurt by Sandusky not the number of wins

    it kind of makes me sick the more I hear of all of the football related vindictiveness. It's like those kids have memories they will never get over and people are concerned more about football. Trivializing. What needs to happen is in the courts. Why do we not have posts about prosecutions, of the President etal? We don't, we have posts about wanting to punish more innocent kids by putting their team on probation or taking some statistics away. Everthing but what is important it seems.

    dentonhorn

  • dentonhorn said...

    it kind of makes me sick the more I hear of all of the football related vindictiveness. It's like those kids have memories they will never get over and people are concerned more about football. Trivializing. What needs to happen is in the courts. Why do we not have posts about prosecutions, of the President etal? We don't, we have posts about wanting to punish more innocent kids by putting their team on probation or taking some statistics away. Everthing but what is important it seems.

    JoPa is the face of this whole thing once you get past Sandusky. People don't feel betrayed by the school president, so that's not the person they're more likely to talk about. Personally, I really want to see Paterno's reputation and legacy dragged through the mud and completely stomped all over. I don't really have any feelings towards the president of the university.

    Blurred Vision

  • dentonhorn said...

    it kind of makes me sick the more I hear of all of the football related vindictiveness. It's like those kids have memories they will never get over and people are concerned more about football. Trivializing. What needs to happen is in the courts. Why do we not have posts about prosecutions, of the President etal? We don't, we have posts about wanting to punish more innocent kids by putting their team on probation or taking some statistics away. Everthing but what is important it seems.

    I agree that football is secondary by a wide margin, and normally does not even belong in the same conversation. What makes this different is that football was the reason this was covered up. So it needs to be part of the punishment.

    UT27am25

  • UT27a&m25 said...

    I agree that football is secondary by a wide margin, and normally does not even belong in the same conversation. What makes this different is that football was the reason this was covered up. So it needs to be part of the punishment.

    It wasn't about the football, but rather protecting their jobs.

    If something like this happened in a business exactly as it has here, it would be like saying that the IRS should seize all the profits the business made, or shut down the business. That's just nuts.

    “Kansas may wind up number one in these polls, but that would be so unfair to Texas...” -- Len Elmore, 2/13/11

    Bob in Houston

  • Beast 512 said...

    I fail to see how the rape of children off the field led to wins on it......

    The reason they did not expose the rape was because they knew it would create a shit storm and it would have severe effects on their school and athletic department.

    It was absolutely a football decision to cover this up.

    Newy25

  • Bob in Houston said...

    It wasn't about the football, but rather protecting their jobs.

    If something like this happened in a business exactly as it has here, it would be like saying that the IRS should seize all the profits the business made, or shut down the business. That's just nuts.

    This is a question that I have asked everyone that says the NCAA should not get involved.

    What should the punishment be then for the school, and athletic department? This has arguably been the most egregious act by any athletic institution in history and you are essentially saying it should be up to the school to decide the punishment.

    Is that correct?

    Newy25

  • Bob in Houston said...

    It wasn't about the football, but rather protecting their jobs.

    If something like this happened in a business exactly as it has here, it would be like saying that the IRS should seize all the profits the business made, or shut down the business. That's just nuts.

    I just do not see the connection. To me it would be like taking from a company any awards for outstanding business accomplishments by a accreditation firm. We are not taking profits. Just acknowledgement of a job well done.

    UT27am25

  • Paterno statue sculptor wonders about his work's fate

    Paterno statue sculptor wonders about his work's fate

    Angelo Di Maria says he will but urges all sides to not make a decision at a time when emotions are running high

    content.usatoday.com
    signature image
    signature image
    signature image

    "Don't know. Never had one" -- D. Royal-Mack Brown how to coach a team after a losing season

    Bruce7

  • Bruce7 said...

    Paterno statue sculptor wonders about his work's fate

    I do not think it is a quick and rash decision considering this was initially exposed in November.

    Newy25

  • Tear down the statue, death penalty the football team, keep removing Paterno's name from scholarships, trophies, buildings etc.

    But leave Paterno on the record books as a warning to future generations as to what happens when you elevate a man to god-like status.

    When you create a demi-god and then put him on a blue and white pedestal, he will do everything with the powers you've given him to protect that pedestal. And that's what happened. Nothing was more important to Paterno than his pedestal and his kingdom. Not death threats to his black students, not disciplinary actions, not innocent children being raped under his nose. As long as no one outside the walls of Penn State heard the cries of those children, his pedestal was safe. So that's what he made sure happened.

    GPie

  • Newy25 said...

    This is a question that I have asked everyone that says the NCAA should not get involved.

    What should the punishment be then for the school, and athletic department? This has arguably been the most egregious act by any athletic institution in history and you are essentially saying it should be up to the school to decide the punishment.

    Is that correct?

    I don't believe the cover-up had anything to do with Penn State football. At the time it occurred, Sandusky was not a coach, not a booster. Any relationship he had with Penn State was because it was permitted by the school.

    Now, did the people facing charges and Paterno deliberately choose not to act against Sandusky? Sure looks like it. That was an incredibly callous act in response to horrific, continuing crimes against children. I agree, it's a huge scandal and deservedly so.

    The punishment is going to be determined by the courts. There will be criminal trials and civil suits. People probably will go to prison. Penn State, as a school, will be hit with huge damages, as will the individuals.

    Regardless of how it happened, nobody can show me where Penn State football was the raison d'etre for the cover up. They appeared to be protecting Sandusky, protecting their jobs. People want to punish the football team because it's an easy line to draw, and they want something they see as surviving to be tarnished. I think when this is all over, that's going to happen anyway. Paterno's legacy already is damaged beyond repair. But I don't think that the athletic department should be punished because it produces a product that is nationally recognized, when there is no indication that Sandusky had anything to do with it after 1999.

    If the NCAA acts in some meaningful way, as a cynic, I believe it will be because the NCAA management believes that public opinion is on its side. But appealing to the mob is no way to run an organization. As I've said before, letting the NCAA decide this one without a rule in place actually opens the way for much less to be adjudicated as well -- it's a bad precedent to set.

    It appears that the NCAA can vote Penn State out. If they want to do that, it's their club... they can pick their own members. But if they're not going to do that (and I don't think they will), they better have something more as a basis for punishment than honesty and integrity, because everybody falls short on that score at some point.

    This post was edited by Bob in Houston on 7/18/2012 at 12:11 PM

    “Kansas may wind up number one in these polls, but that would be so unfair to Texas...” -- Len Elmore, 2/13/11

    Bob in Houston

  • Bob in Houston said...

    I don't believe the cover-up had anything to do with Penn State football. At the time it occurred, Sandusky was not a coach, not a booster. Any relationship he had with Penn State was because it was permitted by the school.

    I 100% disagree with this. Allegations about his abuse occurred when he was a football coach and he had full access to the facilities and was very much part of their alumni foundation and part of their football team. Joe Paterno himself was the one who decided how to handle the cover up while he was the acting football coach.

    Bringing to light this crime would have caused harm to Penn State football. That is precisely why it was covered up! Unless you are suggesting Paterno's intentions were far more sinister like he enjoyed the thought of children being sodomized? The motive was very clear: protect the football program by preventing these allegations from coming to light.

    This was absolutely, positively a move to protect Penn State football.

    Newy25

  • The conclusion of the Freeh report was that the reason for the coverup was to protect the football program.

    GPie

  • Newy25 said...

    This was absolutely, positively a move to protect Penn State football.

    Assuming the others were ready to go to the police in 2001, I believe Paterno lobbied against it to protect his job, and also to protect Sandusky.

    Dan Wetzel pointed out that at the time, Paterno was going through his second straight losing season. He probably figured out that if this came out, he was toast.

    We'll just have to disagree.

    “Kansas may wind up number one in these polls, but that would be so unfair to Texas...” -- Len Elmore, 2/13/11

    Bob in Houston

  • Bob in Houston said...

    Assuming the others were ready to go to the police in 2001, I believe Paterno lobbied against it to protect his job, and also to protect Sandusky.

    Dan Wetzel pointed out that at the time, Paterno was going through his second straight losing season. He probably figured out that if this came out, he was toast.

    We'll just have to disagree.

    I see it the same way you do.

    Beast 512

  • longhorn723 said...

    i doubt any team that lost to USC that year now thinks that they won that game. I doubt that Vince thinks he is the Heisman winner. Stripping games in a situation like this to me is silly. Wrong punishment for the wrong crime. It often seems a shame that death ends a lot of punishments. Think of Ken Lay dying in Colorado and his conviction being set aside, precluding various types of damages being found against him in civil suits, and saving his family a lot of money.

    I would remove the damn statute and give it to the family to do with it what they want. PSU does not need that there.

    but i think and i bet the NCAA does too, that any serious actions against PSU by the NCAA will end up in long lasting litigation that will make a lot of lawyers happy.

    Guess you think Bernie Madoff deserved to keep all his money and is a good business man too...

    Willow01

  • No matter how you look at it:
    1) covered it up to not effect the football program
    2) cover it up to save his job

    they both have the same effect..........Joe P. wanted to win more football games so he covered it up.

    Remember, the 1st allegation came in 1998 when Sandusky was still the D.C. Try recruiting when your D.C. is charged with child rape.

    HoopsCoach

  • For YEARS now, Penn State football has been profitable while this abomination has been going on.

    The school and the program has benefited to the tune of millions of dollars from the cover-up.

    How anyone, anywhere, can't see that is beyond me.

    We deal in recruiting on the website. Just imagine the recruits that PSU would have never snagged had the truth become apparent earlier. It would have changed the face of college football, and PSU's fortunes for sure.

    The numbers are impossible to quantify, but given the offense and the subsequent cover-up, I hope PSU pays in spades.

    Caver60

  • This makes me happy.

    This post was edited by Blurred Vision on 7/22/2012 at 11:00 AM

    Penn State: Paterno statue removed from outside stadium

    Penn State president orders Paterno statue removed

    www.chicagotribune.com

    Blurred Vision

  • Caver60 said...

    For YEARS now, Penn State football has been profitable while this abomination has been going on.

    The school and the program has benefited to the tune of millions of dollars from the cover-up.

    How anyone, anywhere, can't see that is beyond me.

    We deal in recruiting on the website. Just imagine the recruits that PSU would have never snagged had the truth become apparent earlier. It would have changed the face of college football, and PSU's fortunes for sure.

    The numbers are impossible to quantify, but given the offense and the subsequent cover-up, I hope PSU pays in spades.

    Let's say they did the correct thing in 2001. Whether everyone was swept out or not, why wouldn't Penn State football have been "profitable" in the years since?

    And Penn State has a top-15 or so class going for 2013.

    “Kansas may wind up number one in these polls, but that would be so unfair to Texas...” -- Len Elmore, 2/13/11

    Bob in Houston

  • Bob in Houston said...

    And Penn State has a top-15 or so class going for 2013.

    Those kids will never see the campus.

    signature image signature image signature image

    HookemDTX

  • HookemDTX said...

    Those kids will never see the campus.

    Appears that way. But the idea that Penn State would have become a place where players would not have gone isn't supported by that evidence.

    “Kansas may wind up number one in these polls, but that would be so unfair to Texas...” -- Len Elmore, 2/13/11

    Bob in Houston

  • Different coaching staff, different administration. At this point it would be near impossible for Paterno to get commitments if he were alive and still coaching PSU.

    Since the school cleaned house, I think parents feel ok about letting their sons play football there.

    And, Paterno would have been able to sign good players if this had come out in 2001, but maybe not as many, which is why he covered it up. If it came out now that Greg Davis had been molesting kids at football camps a few years ago, we would see a few decommitments and possibly some transfers. Both of which would effect our programs future.

    HoopsCoach