-
GetHooked
- 5 stars Rating: 87
8134 votes total - LHO .
- (7971)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Mitch Connor
- 5 stars Rating: 86
997 votes total - (1145)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20738 votes total - (21408)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Black Shipley
- 4 stars Rating: 70
6799 votes total - (5237)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Mitch Connor
- 5 stars Rating: 86
997 votes total - (1145)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hornographer said...
Wyoming and their poor run defense actually reminds me of one of my complaints regarding Harsin from last season. Kansas and Texas Tech were both very poor run defenses so obviously it made sense to take advantage of that, however we got Malcolm and Joe hurt in back-to-back games and also got minimal work for David Ash. I think an extra 10 passes in each of those games could have gone a long way toward improving his confidence for the remainder of the season and possibly saved one or both of Malcolm and Joe.
Against Kansas, David Ash was 14 of 18 passing while Malcolm had 28 carries and Joe had 13 carries (as a team we rushed 72 times).
Against Tech, David Ash was 4 of 7 passing, Malcolm was held out due to injury and Joe had 29 carries (and an injured toe the rest of the season). We had 54 rushes against Tech as a team.
I'd prefer a 20 point win over a 30+ if it kept everyone healthy and continued to build the passing game. Obviously that's best case scenario and we can't always choose but just something I thought I would bring up.
This post was edited by Newy25 on 7/21/2012 at 7:53 PM
-
Hornographer said...
Wyoming and their poor run defense actually reminds me of one of my complaints regarding Harsin from last season. Kansas and Texas Tech were both very poor run defenses so obviously it made sense to take advantage of that, however we got Malcolm and Joe hurt in back-to-back games and also got minimal work for David Ash. I think an extra 10 passes in each of those games could have gone a long way toward improving his confidence for the remainder of the season and possibly saved one or both of Malcolm and Joe.
Against Kansas, David Ash was 14 of 18 passing while Malcolm had 28 carries and Joe had 13 carries (as a team we rushed 72 times).
Against Tech, David Ash was 4 of 7 passing, Malcolm was held out due to injury and Joe had 29 carries (and an injured toe the rest of the season). We had 54 rushes against Tech as a team.
I'd prefer a 20 point win over a 30+ if it kept everyone healthy and continued to build the passing game. Obviously that's best case scenario and we can't always choose but just something I thought I would bring up.
This post was edited by Togominefield on 7/22/2012 at 2:05 PM
Certainty is the enemy. I think.......
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3













Some quick Wyoming notes and score prediction