Online Now 3143

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

On this Board 932
Record: 4156 (12/1/2012)

Online now 1419
Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

6th Street

The place for off topic discussion on Hookem

Reply

OU counting on new linemen to step up

  • Deep Red said...

    According to ESPN, OU has legitimate ownership of UT.

    Again.....just more opinions.

    SCOREBOARD.

    OU Football = Madoff

    Willow01

  • Willow01 said...

    Again.....just more opinions.

    SCOREBOARD.

    OU Football = Madoff

    The opinion of your pimp.

    Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    The opinion of your pimp.

    Lets see.....ESPN gives OU a worthless opinion and gives us $300 million and you really think they gave you ownership of the University of Texas?

    Quit stealing internet from your trailerpark office and get off of here moron.

    Willow01

  • I can't believe I actually toughed it out and skimmed through pages and pages of nothing but crap.
    You losers engaging in pissing contests where no winner is ever declared have managed to totally derail a pretty good thread. Bruthaman was giving respectful and interesting insight into their line issues. It was a good thread until arrogance, pride and immaturity took over. Here's a clue, when you are the only one posting time after time when there's been no response, people are not listening to your stupid crap. Neither side is.
    Now, what I want to know is how this development of inexperienced, lighter linemen is going to enable OU to successfully run the Belldozer at the 5 yard line against a UT line of 330 lb Moore, Desmond Jackson, Chris Whaley, Ashton Dorsey all backed up by a 260 lb MLB that likes to hurt people.
    I predict that Steve Edmond will have this play renamed the BellRinger.

    This post was edited by TexasBlackjack on 8/11/2012 at 6:27 PM

    TexasBlackjack

  • chupita said...

    Minus the fact that we have ownership of the overall scoreboard between the two teams. How does a team that can't beat another team more times than not have any type of "ownership?" Is that Okie logic? Can you count? 59 is a bigger # than 42 last time I checked.

    Again, Deep shit, tell us about that great offensive line you guys have over there in Norman. We are interested to hear about it. That is the point of this thread afterall.

    What do you mean we? Unless you are 80 years old, YOU ain't got ownership of Jack shit.

    Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    What do you mean we? Unless you are 80 years old, YOU ain't got ownership of Jack shit.

    59-42-5

    You can't have "selective history".

    You would have to win nearly twenty in a row just to catch up.

    Opinions of sportswriters long ago (many of which never even saw you play those seasons) don't really matter to the intelligent fan.

    Texas OWNS Oklahoma football based on REAL ON THE FIELD RESULTS.....not opinions like Bruthaman pointed out earlier in this thread which are a joke.

    Thanks for playing.

    Willow01

  • Willow01 said...

    59-42-5

    You can't have "selective history".

    You would have to win nearly twenty in a row just to catch up.

    Opinions of sportswriters long ago (many of which never even saw you play those seasons) don't really matter to the intelligent fan.

    Texas OWNS Oklahoma football based on REAL ON THE FIELD RESULTS.....not opinions like Bruthaman pointed out earlier in this thread which are a joke.

    Thanks for playing.

    Why do you bother responding to the retard? He's a troll, and not even a good one at that.

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • TexasBlackjack said...

    I can't believe I actually toughed it out and skimmed through pages and pages of nothing but crap. You losers engaging in pissing contests where no winner is ever declared have managed to totally derail a pretty good thread. Bruthaman was giving respectful and interesting insight into their line issues. It was a good thread until arrogance, pride and immaturity took over. Here's a clue, when you are the only one posting time after time when there's been no response, people are not listening to your stupid crap. Neither side is. Now, what I want to know is how this development of inexperienced, lighter linemen is going to enable OU to successfully run the Belldozer at the 5 yard line against a UT line of 330 lb Moore, Desmond Jackson, Chris Whaley, Ashton Dorsey all backed up by a 260 lb MLB that likes to hurt people. I predict that Steve Edmond will have this play renamed the BellRinger.

    C'mon Jack, you guys are fans of an elite football program are you not? Its all about angles dude. Ill leave you to figure out the rest. As for the light young linemen, they are doing well. After a couple of scrimmages, people have stepped back from the ledge.

    This post was edited by bruthaman on 8/12/2012 at 6:13 AM

    There is nothing more dangerous in this world than a man with nothing to lose.

    bruthaman

  • Willow01 said...

    59-42-5

    You can't have "selective history".

    You would have to win nearly twenty in a row just to catch up.

    Opinions of sportswriters long ago (many of which never even saw you play those seasons) don't really matter to the intelligent fan.

    Texas OWNS Oklahoma football based on REAL ON THE FIELD RESULTS.....not opinions like Bruthaman pointed out earlier in this thread which are a joke.

    Thanks for playing.

    Sure I can have selective history. I ain't 80 years old. ESPN used selective history and proclaimed OU the best program of all time.

    However, ESPN isn't anyone I would trust. They have biases.

    Deep Red

  • TexasBlackjack said...

    I can't believe I actually toughed it out and skimmed through pages and pages of nothing but crap.
    You losers engaging in pissing contests where no winner is ever declared have managed to totally derail a pretty good thread. Bruthaman was giving respectful and interesting insight into their line issues. It was a good thread until arrogance, pride and immaturity took over. Here's a clue, when you are the only one posting time after time when there's been no response, people are not listening to your stupid crap. Neither side is.
    Now, what I want to know is how this development of inexperienced, lighter linemen is going to enable OU to successfully run the Belldozer at the 5 yard line against a UT line of 330 lb Moore, Desmond Jackson, Chris Whaley, Ashton Dorsey all backed up by a 260 lb MLB that likes to hurt people.
    I predict that Steve Edmond will have this play renamed the BellRinger.

    Sorry for my involvement in fuzzing up this thread. Your resident flamers tend to enjoy a piss.

    How will the Bell Dozer effectively move the ball against your big boys? First of all, you don't know whether your new big boys have what it takes to stop it as it stands. OU has earned results using that formation. It really has yet to be contained. I know myself, I wouldn't want to depend on the 330 DT because conditioning and reliability seem to be known issues.

    I too am interested in seeing Edmonds. There is a reason linebackers in college and the pros don't traditionally play that
    heavy. We'll see what strengths come with it along with the weaknesses.

    Under Mack and Stoops, I don't ever really remember a UT/KSU '11 defensive effort out of the Horns. Whether it's Bell or any of the rest of our O, you won't shut us down. While I can see an effort in the 400 yard range, I don't see 400 yards of offense from UT. Your offense is limited, and nothing magical is going to happen in the next two months.

    How do Sooner fans feel about our OL? I feel really good about our top 7. In no way would I take the UT OL in a swap. I think Walters would start, but none of the others could replace the OL OU will roll with in the Shootout.

    Deep Red

  • Kelso said...

    Why do you bother responding to the retard? He's a troll, and not even a good one at that.

    Out of the two of us, one took a retarded stance in handicapping the '11 RRS. The other went with obvious indicators that pointed to a more likely game scenario.

    Does your memory of a year ago allow you to effectively sort the two differing predictions?

    Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    Out of the two of us, one took a retarded stance in handicapping the '11 RRS. The other went with obvious indicators that pointed to a more likely game scenario.

    Does your memory of a year ago allow you to effectively sort the two differing predictions?

    Did you finally confer with your brethren and decide to come back with that retort? Do you need help writing your own responses? Seems so. Jesus Christ, it only took you a whole 24 hours to respond.

    Here's a novel idea- leave.

    You're a used tampon of a poster, and no one cares what you think. Believe it or not, but your buddy is actually tolerated because he gives insightful responses. You, however, are a moron flamer. You add zero substance to any thread that you think you have to be involved in. Go away. I have nothing against OU as a school or team, I just cant stand your dumbass. When you can bring something worthwhile to the table, and by "something" i mean a meaningful response to threads, I won't make fun of you and make you look like a typical moronic, okie trailer dwelling knuckle dragging retard. Although, i really don't have to, you do that all on your own.

    This post was edited by Kelso on 8/12/2012 at 1:07 PM

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • Kelso said...

    Did you finally confer with your brethren and decide to come back with that retort? Do you need help writing your own responses? Seems so. Jesus Christ, it only took you a whole 24 hours to respond.

    Here's a novel idea- leave.

    You're a used tampon of a poster, and no one cares what you think. Believe it or not, but your buddy is actually tolerated because he gives insightful responses. You, however, are a moron flamer. You add zero substance to any thread that you think you have to be involved in. Go away. I have nothing against OU as a school or team, I just cant stand your dumbass. When you can bring something worthwhile to the table, and by "something" i mean a meaningful response to threads, I won't make fun of you and make you look like a typical moronic, okie trailer dwelling knuckle dragging retard. Although, i really don't have to, you do that all on your own.

    Out of the two of us, one lives on insults that indicate youth. Youth rarely trump experienced maturity.

    There is irony in a youthful poster referring to another as a retard (total lack of sensitivity to those who are inflicted or care for loved ones with retardation) again, an indicator of inexperienced youth.

    Listen, I know it hurts to have to eat crow, but you fixed a plate and after the '11 RRS one of us was going to have to eat it. Deal with it. If you'd lost on a missed FG I wouldn't even expect you to eat it. However, as I pointed out to you last fall, the game wouldn't be close.

    Now stop being a hypocrite with the mental defeciencies.

    Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    Out of the two of us, one lives on insults that indicate youth. Youth rarely trump experienced maturity.

    There is irony in a youthful poster referring to another as a retard (total lack of sensitivity to those who are inflicted or care for loved ones with retardation) again, an indicator of inexperienced youth.

    Listen, I know it hurts to have to eat crow, but you fixed a plate and after the '11 RRS one of us was going to have to eat it. Deal with it. If you'd lost on a missed FG I wouldn't even expect you to eat it. However, as I pointed out to you last fall, the game wouldn't be close.

    Now stop being a hypocrite with the mental defeciencies.

    Read slowly- I already ate crow after the loss on y'alls board. Go back and check the boards and you will clearly see what I wrote, m'kay? Look, I agree about using the word "retard". I should not, in any way, use that because it is making fun of those who have an IQ below 70. You're clearly not retarded as you can keep coming back and typing somewhat coherent sentences. The problem is that you come on our board and start disrespecting my fellow posters. This is not your board. I don't give two shits what you want to say to any longhorn fan on your board, but when you come over here, you need to have the understanding that there may or may not be friendly posters towards ou fans. I couldn't care less if you're a fan of ou, or a fan men's cheerleading. I will call a truce between us. There really shouldn't be that much butthurt over a game of football. Personally, it's just a game and both sides go on streaks. i'm not even thinking about last season, as I continue to look to the future for brighter spots.

    ou sucks, and good luck with y'alls season.

    Hook 'Em Horns.

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    Ok kelso.

    Would you prefer going back and forth? It really makes no difference to me, Deep Red. Seriously, I can do this as much as you like.

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • Kelso said...

    Would you prefer going back and forth? It really makes no difference to me, Deep Red. Seriously, I can do this as much as you like.

    I'm sure we will have future opportunities as the game approaches. Along with the occassional OU thread.

    Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    I'm sure we will have future opportunities as the game approaches. Along with the occassional OU thread.

    Not really, seeing as how I rarely ever get in on conversations about ou. Frankly, there's nothing I find remotely interesting about ou, other than a few players. You won't find me making excuses about how stoops has the upper hand over Mack in the series. I don't care about all time records, I care about the coaches now, and Mack, imo, hadnt been getting it done like he should be. Do I think we have the players and coaches to take back the series? yes. Do i think Texas will beat ou this year? I have no idea, but I'm hopeful. I think they could, but thinking doesn't translate to winning right now. That's why they play the game.

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • Deep Red said...

    I'm sure we will have future opportunities as the game approaches. Along with the occassional OU thread.

    Not really, seeing as how I rarely ever get in on conversations about ou. Frankly, there's nothing I find remotely interesting about ou, other than a few players. You won't find me making excuses about how stoops has the upper hand over Mack in the series. I don't care about all time records, I care about the coaches now, and Mack, imo, hadnt been getting it done like he should be. Do I think we have the players and coaches to take back the series? yes. Do i think Texas will beat ou this year? I have no idea, but I'm hopeful. I think they could, but thinking doesn't translate to winning right now. That's why they play the game.

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • Kelso said...

    Not really, seeing as how I rarely ever get in on conversations about ou. Frankly, there's nothing I find remotely interesting about ou, other than a few players. You won't find me making excuses about how stoops has the upper hand over Mack in the series. I don't care about all time records, I care about the coaches now, and Mack, imo, hadnt been getting it done like he should be. Do I think we have the players and coaches to take back the series? yes. Do i think Texas will beat ou this year? I have no idea, but I'm hopeful. I think they could, but thinking doesn't translate to winning right now. That's why they play the game.

    Just as everyone knows, your success comes down to QB play. Your second issue is OL health. You solved the previous #2 issue with the addition of Fera.

    I think a key point for UT is maximizing the ability of big play potential from guys like Goodwin, Gray, Daje, and Monroe. Shipley should be your Broyles if only you can get him the ball enough, but those speed guys need opportunities. Those guys provide you point opportunities without having to put together 10 play drives.

    Deep Red

  • Deep Red said...

    Just as everyone knows, your success comes down to QB play. Your second issue is OL health. You solved the previous #2 issue with the addition of Fera.

    I think a key point for UT is maximizing the ability of big play potential from guys like Goodwin, Gray, Daje, and Monroe. Shipley should be your Broyles if only you can get him the ball enough, but those speed guys need opportunities. Those guys provide you point opportunities without having to put together 10 play drives.

    Definitely agree. QB play is a huge question mark, imo. We can have all the skill guys in the world, but if we're still having inaccuracy issues, we're in trouble. Ash (or someone) has to step up. I'm not saying they have to be Colt, Bradford, Vince, etc..., but theyre gonna have to lead some scoring drives. I'm still a little unsure about our oline, personally. We have the guys, but can they play as a cohesive unit? I think we have the coaching, but our bodies are still lacking. It will he interesting to see if Mack has truly brought the SEC run game to the conference, and if it can manage to work for a full schedule. Can we keep up with ou's passing, OSU passing, wvu passing, etc...? That's the only thing that worries me.

    "Pavlov was this scientist guy, you know, and every time this dog would ring a bell, Pavlov would eat."

    Kelso

  • What..... Is this a civil conversation?? Nonsense.

    SoonerSeif

  • Kelso - I highly recommend the "ignore" function for trolls. I have all the Sooner posters over here on ignore with the exception of Bruthuman & a few others.

    This post was edited by AllenHorn on 8/13/2012 at 7:45 AM

    AllenHorn

  • ALERT For anyone viewing this thread for the first time.

    Start by putting Deep Red and Kelso on ignore, read the thread, and then remove the ignore. It will make a lot more sense if you do.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Even if it means pissin' you off a little bit to get you to work, I'm not gonna' let you down. ~ Bennie Wylie

    papa horn

  • some retardation going on in this thread, from both sides.

    If a bullfrog had wings, it wouldn't bump its ass

    Kspoon