Online Now 606

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

On this Board 351
Record: 4156 (12/1/2012)

Online now 615
Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

6th Street

The place for off topic discussion on Hookem

Reply

Georgia Tech to B1G

  • Didn't see this on here but have seen it on twitter .

    Qpackage

  • Wouldn't surprise me. Wonder if Delaney leaves that last spot open for Notre Dame or if they just go ahead and pluck another school and are done at 16.

    Hookem89

  • Bowlsby needs to start being a commissioner and not best friends with Delost Dodds .

    LonghornMando25

  • I see a push for BC happening next all pushing ND to join the B1G in some sort of affiliation

    Qpackage

  • Qpackage said...

    Didn't see this on here but have seen it on twitter .

    I'm breathlessly awaiting the day we're all connected by direct neural implants, so we won't have to wait for a 140 character message to spread. Instead, we can all join the debate the instant one person thinks something might be possible.

    bierce

  • LonghornMando25 said...

    Bowlsby needs to start being a commissioner and not best friends with Delost Dodds .

    DeLOST? Is that like CART McCoy? Grow up.

    DLev

  • Lots of twitter noise but could be an echo chamber of the uninformed.

    If it is true it's hard to understand the Big 10 approach to expansion, at least as it relates to football. The Big 10 is like a drunken frat guy picking up whatever tail will go home with him as the bar is closing. One would think there are better options that can achieve TV markets, academics and decent football (potential). With Rutgers, Maryland and Georgia Tech the Big 10 looks like a weaker football conference.

    If true this would be good for the Big 12, if we decide to expand with ACC schools.

    This post was edited by Jackdaddy on 11/30/2012 at 11:21 AM

    Jackdaddy

  • Any moves that destabilize the ACC are good for the Big 12. Georgia Tech leaving means the ACC will have to grab a basketball school like UCONN. That will further anger FSU who's already looking at playing in the worst BCS ever if Kent State wins tonight and is BCS eligible.

    mdmost

  • Jackdaddy said...

    Lots of twitter noise but could be an echo chamber of the uninformed.

    If it is true it's hard to understand the Big 10 approach to expansion, at least as it relates to football. The Big 10 is like a drunken frat guy picking up whatever tail will go home with him as the bar is closing. One would think there are better options that can achieve TV markets, academics and decent football (potential). With Rutgers, Maryland and Georgia Tech the Big 10 looks like a weaker football conference.

    If true this would be good for the Big 12, if we decide to expand with ACC schools.

    I'd say Atlanta, Jersey, and the Baltimore/DC area are pretty size able TV markets.

    And remember this means more money for the Big 10 Network. As the price per subscriber almost doubles when there is a Big 10 school in that state. So they just doubled their profit in Georgia, Maryland, as Jersey.

    txlonghorn47

  • txlonghorn47 said...

    I'd say Atlanta, Jersey, and the Baltimore/DC area are pretty size able TV markets.

    And remember this means more money for the Big 10 Network. As the price per subscriber almost doubles when there is a Big 10 school in that state. So they just doubled their profit in Georgia, Maryland, as Jersey.

    I get the TV argument. Clearly the Big 10 will financially strengthen the Big 10 Network with these moves. I just don't think these actual (Rutgers and Maryland) and potential (Georgia Tech) additions make the product on the football field any better.

    Jackdaddy

  • Jackdaddy said...

    I get the TV argument. Clearly the Big 10 will financially strengthen the Big 10 Network with these moves. I just don't think these actual (Rutgers and Maryland) and potential (Georgia Tech) additions make the product on the football field any better.

    Living in DC, I can tell you Maryland football is an afterthought. VT is much more important to the DC market than MD. I'm not sure how it is in Baltimore, but I can't imagine it really is a big deal there. Baltimore seems to be more of a pro sports town. I honestly don't get the MD invitation.

    DCTexasEx

  • DCTexasEx said...

    Living in DC, I can tell you Maryland football is an afterthought. VT is much more important to the DC market than MD. I'm not sure how it is in Baltimore, but I can't imagine it really is a big deal there. Baltimore seems to be more of a pro sports town. I honestly don't get the MD invitation.

    Maryland is an AAU member and the "Public Ivy" institution closest to DC. Va Tech just isn't what the B1G is after.

    bierce

  • Yes, I agree. Darren Rovell reported the following this morning.

    "With a BCS bid on the line, only 2.6% of New York City was watching the Rutgers game on ESPN last night."

    Rutgers is an afterthought in NYC.

    This post was edited by Jackdaddy on 11/30/2012 at 12:39 PM

    darren rovell (darrenrovell) on Twitter

    Instantly connect to whats most important to you. Follow your friends, experts, favorite celebrities, and breaking news.

    twitter.com

    Jackdaddy

  • Jackdaddy said...

    I get the TV argument. Clearly the Big 10 will financially strengthen the Big 10 Network with these moves. I just don't think these actual (Rutgers and Maryland) and potential (Georgia Tech) additions make the product on the football field any better.

    Maybe bringing in some weaker schools at football will allow for the old powerhouses like Michigan, Ohio State, Nebraska, etc get more wins or it is all about the $$$.

    Hookem89

  • Hookem89 said...

    Maybe bringing in some weaker schools at football will allow for the old powerhouses like Michigan, Ohio State, Nebraska, etc get more wins or it is all about the $$$.

    No doubt this should result in an easier schedule for those schools. But do they need an easier schedule?

    Jackdaddy

  • bierce said...

    Maryland is an AAU member and the "Public Ivy" institution closest to DC. Va Tech just isn't what the B1G is after.

    That makes sense, because the TV sets reasoning certainly doesn't.

    DCTexasEx

  • I think the B1G has blown it with these additions. NYC and DC are not in the footprint for Rutgers and Maryland, so there's ZERO incentive for the providers to pay the additional fees that Delany wants. Maryland only makes sense if they get Virginia to get the northern VA TV markets (and stupidly high standard of living).

    While Atlanta is in the footprint for Georgia Tech (considering the school is downtown ATL), it is very much an SEC/UGA town. GT has an enormous amount of tradition and potential but this makes little sense for either the bugs or the B1G.

    But by all means B1g, please continue to destabilize the ACC so that we can poach the bigger prizes.

    This post was edited by The Dog on 11/30/2012 at 1:50 PM

    The Dog

  • Jackdaddy said...

    No doubt this should result in an easier schedule for those schools. But do they need an easier schedule?

    We do. This 9 game grind is going to F*ck the Big 12's championship possibilities if we keep it up.

    signature image

    www.thecorraliban.net

    Jexes23

  • If you think about it long term, the schools added and the additional $$$ they will be getting will help their programs in the future, which will hopefully lead to better football, basketball programs, etc. More money, better programs.

    MannyRDB

  • Jexes23 said...

    We do. This 9 game grind is going to F*ck the Big 12's championship possibilities if we keep it up.

    "Bu, bu, bu, butt the conference as it is allows for an easier path to a national championship! Conference expansion just scares me to DEATH! Derrrrp!" - Mack Dodds

    Black Shipley

  • Black Shipley said...

    "Bu, bu, bu, butt the conference as it is allows for an easier path to a national championship! Conference expansion just scares me to DEATH! Derrrrp!" - Mack Dodds

    Those two are idiots. Especially when Georgia and Bama just showed everyone the path to the championship is making sure you avoid all the tough teams in the other division.

    signature image

    www.thecorraliban.net

    Jexes23

  • Jexes23 said...

    Those two are idiots. Especially when Georgia and Bama just showed everyone the path to the championship is making sure you avoid all the tough teams in the other division.

    Plus 1... Being saying it for some time...

    LonghornMando25

  • LonghornMando25 said...

    Plus 1... Being saying it for some time...

    Bu, bu, bu, buttt... you're not a 'friend' of the program and you don't get paid $5M to coach, so your opinion is worthless.

    Black Shipley

  • DCTexasEx said...

    That makes sense, because the TV sets reasoning certainly doesn't.

    I suspect the B1G also has a belief that its presence as a conference in the vicinity will increase viewership of all conference games as well as the fanbase for the new invitees in the area. Of course, I don't necessarily see the logic behind expecting a team to be more popular in its own neighborhood upon becoming a doormat.

    bierce

  • Jackdaddy said...

    Yes, I agree. Darren Rovell reported the following this morning.

    "With a BCS bid on the line, only 2.6% of New York City was watching the Rutgers game on ESPN last night."

    Rutgers is an afterthought in NYC.

    This confirms what a Rutgers grad friend of mine told me that NY/NJ is a Pro-Sports area... it's not even a 'friends w/ benefits' scenario!

    signature image

    Hot Rod