Online Now 954

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

On this Board 1305
Record: 4156 (12/1/2012)

Online now 1656
Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

6th Street

The place for off topic discussion on Hookem

Reply

Does Texas get a BCS game if we Win out?

  • With K-State losing tonight, if Texas Wins out and hand K-State another loss, is it likely that Texas would get a BCS Bowl bid even if OU wins the Conference?

    2 BCS bids for the Big 12?

    Would Texas likely get picked for it over K-State?

    signature image signature image signature image

    RoosterNTexas

  • Texas would be a very attractive BCS team and would get picked over KSU.

    bat

  • Yes. Without a doubt. A 10-2 UT is much more attractive than a 10-2 KSU for TV and traveling fan purposes.

    bbliss

  • Yes.. we are very attractive team and so 2 loses would get us in

    signature image signature image signature image

    Jetson212

  • Maybe. There is still the problem of there being only 4 at large spots available, and there is a not far-fetched scenario to have 4 teams finish at 11-1 or better who would not be in a position to take an auto berth and would be looking to one of the at large berths.

    We know Notre Dame is in, since it will finish no worse than 11-1.
    If Florida beats FSU, it gets in at 11-1, but is has been eliminated from the SEC championship game.
    If Stanford beats UCLA on Saturday, the Stanford-UCLA rematch will determine Pac 12 auto bid. If Oregon beats Oregon State, it gets in at 11-1.
    Clemson is not eligible for the ACC championship game. If if beats South Carolina, it could be picked at 11-1.

    Would Texas be a more desirable commodity than some of those due to name, size, etc? Maybe. Is it more deserving at 10-2? Maybe not.

    We definitely want at least one of the following to happen on Saturday:

    UCLA to beat Stanford
    South Carolina to beat Clemson

    I don't think Florida losing will matter. Texas will not vault all the 10-2 SEC teams ahead of it, since the Sugar Bowl will probably lose Alabama or Georgia to the championship game, be in a position to select a replacement, and will likely opt for another SEC team.

    bierce

  • Texas will be chosen over any 2 loss at large team.

    NLeininger

  • Too many scenarios to know for sure.

    1. Notre Dame
    2. SEC champion (Alabama)
    3. Big East Champion (Louisville or Rutgers)
    4. ACC Champ (FSU)
    5. Big 10 Champ
    6. Pac-12 Champ
    7. Big 12 Champ

    Looking like...while anything from a done deal

    BCS Championship Game: Notre Dame v. Alabama
    Rose Bowl: Big 10 Champ (Nebraska) vs. Pac-12 Champ (Stanford)
    Orange Bowl: ACC Champ (FSU) vs. at-large
    Sugar Bowl: SEC #2 selection (Georgia) vs. at-large
    Fiesta Bowl: Big 12 Champ vs. Big East (Louisville)

    Teams still in the hunt not mentioned:

    Kansas State
    Oregon
    Clemson
    Oklahoma
    Florida
    LSU
    Texas
    Texas A&M

    This post was edited by Gerry Hamilton on 11/18/2012 at 2:35 PM

    National Director of Scouting & Recruiting Analyst @GerryHam247

    Gerry Hamilton

  • Texas would need Clemson to lose to South Carolina.

    TXA2009

  • Yeah, looks like Clemson needs to lose

    hooked3333

  • hooked3333 said...

    Yeah, looks like Clemson needs to lose

    If Clemson is not in the top 4, they aren't going over 10-2 Texas.

    NLeininger

  • NLeininger said...

    If Clemson is not in the top 4, they aren't going over 10-2 Texas.

    If you consider Clemson to be held in such low regard, why are you so keen on them joining the Big 12?

    bierce

  • bierce said...

    If you consider Clemson to be held in such low regard, why are you so keen on them joining the Big 12?

    You don't seem to know how the game works that well. The BCS is about making money. Clemson doesn't move those needles like Texas does. That has nothing to do with the quality of a program Clemson has, or the level of competition they would bring to the field.

    NLeininger

  • RoosterNTexas said...

    With K-State losing tonight, if Texas Wins out and hand K-State another loss, is it likely that Texas would get a BCS Bowl bid even if OU wins the Conference?

    2 BCS bids for the Big 12?

    Would Texas likely get picked for it over K-State?

    Texas better TV ratings but KSU will travel better......toss up. I think we have a better shot vs KSU than TCU after last night.

    "Leadership is wisdom, courage and great carelessness of self"

    austinr

  • bierce said...

    If you consider Clemson to be held in such low regard, why are you so keen on them joining the Big 12?

    Good point!

    "Leadership is wisdom, courage and great carelessness of self"

    austinr

  • NLeininger said...

    You don't seem to know how the game works that well. The BCS is about making money. Clemson doesn't move those needles like Texas does. That has nothing to do with the quality of a program Clemson has, or the level of competition they would bring to the field.

    No, I think I just don't know how your brain works, thank you.

    If Clemson doesn't move the needle for BCS purposes, I fail to see how hit moves the needle for conference strength and stability purposes. See my comment on the Rutgers/Maryland thread regarding whether Clemson is a less desirable property than other ACC schools. It might have a good football team today, but the reasons for bringing it into the fold (markets, audiences, $$$$) don't seem to be there.

    bierce

  • bierce said...

    No, I think I just don't know how your brain works, thank you.

    If Clemson doesn't move the needle for BCS purposes, I fail to see how hit moves the needle for conference strength and stability purposes. See my comment on the Rutgers/Maryland thread regarding whether Clemson is a less desirable property than other ACC schools. It might have a good football team today, but the reasons for bringing it into the fold (markets, audiences, $$$$) don't seem to be there.

    When compared to Texas, Clemson doesn't move the needles like Texas does. If Texas isn't an option then Clemson would probably get the last at-large.

    Clemson is less desirable when compared to Texas or OU most teams are, but compared to the rest of the ACC they are light years ahead.

    NLeininger

  • Gerry Hamilton said...

    Too many scenarios to know for sure.

    1. Notre Dame 2. SEC champion (Alabama) 3. Big East Champion (Louisville or Rutgers) 4. ACC Champ (FSU) 5. Big 10 Champ 6. Pac-12 Champ 7. Big 12 Champ

    Looking like...while anything from a done deal

    BCS Championship Game: Notre Dame v. Alabama Rose Bowl: Big 10 Champ (Nebraska) vs. Pac-12 Champ (Stanford) Orange Bowl: ACC Champ (FSU) vs. at-large Sugar Bowl: SEC #2 selection (Georgia) vs. at-large Fiesta Bowl: Big 12 Champ vs. Big East (Louisville)

    Teams still in the hunt not mentioned:

    Kansas State Oregon Clemson Oklahoma Florida LSU Texas Texas A&M

    Florida, A&M, and LSU won't be in the hunt if Georgia plays in the Sugar Bowl. The BCS still has its two-per-conference rule. One of Texas, KSU, and OU will be the Big 12 champ. If Texas runs the table, I really don't believe the Orange or Sugar is going to take KSU on a two-game losing streak, including a loss to 10-2 Texas, over Texas. The only schools that would be of issue would be Clemson and Oregon, and there's a decent chance Oregon still wins the Pac 12.

    bbliss

  • Seeing this I have mixed feelings about winning the league if it means a game against Rutgers or Louisville. More attractive match up if we finish second in the conference and play in the Orange, Sugar or Cotton Bowls.

    JerseyBornHorn

  • austinr said...

    Texas better TV ratings but KSU will travel better......toss up. I think we have a better shot vs KSU than TCU after last night.

    I don't see how anyone would pick Kstate over Texas for the other at large spot if it comes to that. Remember Kstate will have lost two in a row and by beating Kstate, Texas will definitely be the "hot team" in the conference. You add that to the huge following that Texas has and to me it's no contest on that front. Another thing to consider is the prospect of an OU loss to OSU, which as of now seems quite possible. I really feel that Texas will be playing K state for what ultimately could be the Big 12 championship game Dec. 1st. No matter what, we still have to take care of our business and that starts this Thursday.

    txhookem78

  • txhookem78 said...

    I don't see how anyone would pick Kstate over Texas for the other at large spot if it comes to that. Remember Kstate will have lost two in a row and by beating Kstate, Texas will definitely be the "hot team" in the conference. You add that to the huge following that Texas has and to me it's no contest on that front. Another thing to consider is the prospect of an OU loss to OSU, which as of now seems quite possible. I really feel that Texas will be playing K state for what ultimately could be the Big 12 championship game Dec. 1st. No matter what, we still have to take care of our business and that starts this Thursday.

    Agree with your post but remember teams being hot etc has nothing to do it. ......bowls making the most money is the deal.

    "Leadership is wisdom, courage and great carelessness of self"

    austinr

  • austinr said...

    Agree with your post but remember teams being hot etc has nothing to do it. ......bowls making the most money is the deal.

    I agree (always been about $$$) but media perception certainly does have something to do with rankings... just ask the SEC. No question if we were to win against Kstate, the media would play that up to some extent (maybe a little less now however with the Baylor win). My point is Texas definitely would be ranked higher than both Oklahoma and Kstate and in my mind would get the nod as one of the at large teams, if not an automatic invite, assuming OSU beats OU next weekend.

    txhookem78