Online Now 673

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

On this Board 438
Record: 4156 (12/1/2012)

Online now 698
Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Horns247 Board

The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns

6th Street

The place for off topic discussion on Hookem

Reply

Do you like the Huhn take?

  • I can understand why some may have second thoughts, but I personally like the commitment based on the fact that Texas has been so judicious with offers this year.

    If Texas coaches liked what they saw enough on Sunday, then it must have made a lasting impression not just on Duane Akina, but the entire defensive coaching staff.

    That's part of why I like this commitment. Here are a few other reasons.

    1. I think Huhn is versatile. I think he could be a strong safety you walk up and essentially can put 7 or 8 in the box depending on the called package.

    2. I think he could be a weakside or even strongside linebacker depending on where his body goes.

    3. I think he will be a special teams player from the get go.

    4. If you aren't the fastest, you better be extremely physical and he is that.

    A couple of legitimate questions:

    1. If Texas plays so much man coverage at safety, why take a zone safety which is what Huhn is best projected as?

    The answer is simple. Huhn could project to a strong safety or outside linebacker spot. But the Texas coaches feel like his athleticism, speed, size and physicality were good enough to make him a player for the Horns. And the coaches made this decision AFTER they have been extremely judicious with defensive offers all spring. They saw a way to use Huhn that may they hadn't really seen before Sunday's workout.

    2. Does this preclude Texas from taking another safety?

    No, it does not. Offers to Vonn Bell and Marcel Harris are still outstanding.

    3. Does it effect Cole Luke?

    No. Luke is considered a corner and his offer remains outstanding. Same with Maurice Smith. The one it may effect is Chevoski Collins, who is considered more of a safety than corner though some feel Collins is very much a Adrian Phillips type.

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • Who would you choose Huhn or Collins based on overall package?

    signature image signature image signature image

    HOOkem4LifE

  • I like it. I believe he'll be more of a Cobbs type player. The thing I'm worried about is that I've read he gets injured a lot. Even in his highlight video, there's a play where he pops someone, but Huhn is the one that stays on the ground afterwards.

    NavyHorn28

  • Bobby,

    You make some very good points. Unless they are wanting a little more variety in their defensive play calling (zone v man), I have to go for the impression that he will end up as an outside linebacker. Assuming he makes that move, can you compare him to N. Hughes as a linebacker only?

    If the coaches are convinced he has the speed to play safety, I will rely on guys like Akina and Diaz who I fully respect and that versatility would be fantastic. But I am just curious about comparing Hughes and Huhn as linebacker prospects.

    (my take is that I haven't seen enough of anything on Huhn to make a judgement call either way, hence I'm just asking the question)

    HookemAtl

  • HOOkem4LifE said...

    Who would you choose Huhn or Collins based on overall package?

    Good question IMO.

    It depends on what I'm looking for.

    Going into Sundays camp, I clearly would have said Collins and I think so would have the Texas coaches. Coming out of Sundays camp, I'm not so sure.

    I think Huhn will help more on special teams more quickly, and could give them the versatility to grow into an OLB. With Collins, it's probably safety or bust. I have no problem with spinning players down or to different positions. I think you take football players and find the position for them, especially on defense.

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • Nice summary Bobby....I agree with every point you made. Now, that more of the back story has come out this kid was not as "off the grid" as many originally assumed. He was a Junior Day invite, Akina has been keeping an eye on him, and he'd received some fairly impressive offers. It was more a case of no one was really talking about him as a serious target as much as anything.

    The only real question out there is whether or not we needed to offer him in June knowing full well he would immediately jump on the offer and commit? My guess is the timing of this offer indicates the numbers are shaping up to not be quite as tight as originally thought and will have little impact on the other outstanding offers.

    BagHorn

  • Thanks Bobby, the thing that I have noticed about the Texas personnel over the last few years since Manny arrived is how interchangeable our roster is on defense. We now have personnel to truly be a multiple defense weather it is a 4-2-5, 3-4, or 4-3 without having to play guys out of position. This offer basically proves to me that we now recruit guys to fit our scheme. I love this pickup

    deronjohn

  • HookemAtl said...

    Bobby,

    You make some very good points. Unless they are wanting a little more variety in their defensive play calling (zone v man), I have to go for the impression that he will end up as an outside linebacker. Assuming he makes that move, can you compare him to N. Hughes as a linebacker only?

    If the coaches are convinced he has the speed to play safety, I will rely on guys like Akina and Diaz who I fully respect and that versatility would be fantastic. But I am just curious about comparing Hughes and Huhn as linebacker prospects.

    (my take is that I haven't seen enough of anything on Huhn to make a judgement call either way, hence I'm just asking the question)

    First of all, it's not a given that Nashon stays as a greyshirt. We should always keep that in mind.

    I think Huhn's more physical than Hughes certainly. And I think straight-line as a blitzer he'll be better than Hughes. What Hughes has is lateral mobility and longer arms.

    But Huhn is a different category. He's a guy who can line up over a tight end, have the size, speed and physicality to not be a fish out of water in coverage or against the run. So whether you're playing a 4-3 and he's an OLB or in the nickel, it's really the same sort of hybrid role he's playing.

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • I like it a lot.

    The interceptions number is impressive; plus, he seems to react very quickly and takes good angles.

    phil4825445

  • NavyHorn28 said...

    I like it. I believe he'll be more of a Cobbs type player. The thing I'm worried about is that I've read he gets injured a lot. Even in his highlight video, there's a play where he pops someone, but Huhn is the one that stays on the ground afterwards.

    I know Cobbs is a favorite but I don't think Huhn has that sort of athleticism. Huhn is more of a power athlete. When I think of Huhn, I think of Nebraska or TCU hybrid safeties/outside linebackers.

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • I like it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    RoosterNTexas

  • My thoughts exactly. What are you? Some kind of min reader.

    If the coaches were blown away, then I'm good with it

    Let me add a little more. I love safety play...I mean love. It's my favorite position. We tend to play 4 corner and it has worked very well for us. Griffin, huff, and Thomas all came out of the 4 corner and turned into good nfl safeties. I have always wanted that Darren Woodson or Roy Williams type safety though. Hard to find but I don't mind them looking. Plus with the blitzing Diaz likes to do, a player like this makes a lot of sense.

    This post was edited by Sancho on 6/4/2012 at 11:43 AM

    Sancho

  • BobbyBurton said...

    First of all, it's not a given that Nashon stays as a greyshirt. We should always keep that in mind.

    I think Huhn's more physical than Hughes certainly. And I think straight-line as a blitzer he'll be better than Hughes. What Hughes has is lateral mobility and longer arms.

    But Huhn is a different category. He's a guy who can line up over a tight end, have the size, speed and physicality to not be a fish out of water in coverage or against the run. So whether you're playing a 4-3 and he's an OLB or in the nickel, it's really the same sort of hybrid role he's playing.

    That makes sense to me. Thank you.

    I think too many times I can get caught up into the ratings/evaluations of players and don't see as well how certain people may fit roles better even not quite as highly rated. I've just always had the mantra of "take the best player available" in my head about most drafts and recruitings so when I see a 3 star get an offer over others that are rated higher, it gives me pause to second guess. Thanks for answering.

    HookemAtl

  • Violence in a S/OLB is something this team needs more of. When Vacarro signed there were some questions about how good of a take he was, but as soon as he got on the field on special teams you could tell that the violence he played with would make him a difference maker. He's developed coverage skills since then, but his suddenness and violence is what makes him special. Hopefully this kid can at least fill that role on special teams.

    signature image signature image signature image

    khorn28

  • How many scholly spots do we have left for 2013?

    signature image signature image signature image

    HOOkem4LifE

  • BagHorn said...

    The only real question out there is whether or not we needed to offer him in June knowing full well he would immediately jump on the offer and commit? My guess is the timing of this offer indicates the numbers are shaping up to not be quite as tight as originally thought and will have little impact on the other outstanding offers.

    Both fair thoughts IMO.

    As it relates to waiting too long, if you've had them in camp prior to their senior year and you've seen enough, then it comes down to whether or not you think one in hand is worth two in the bush. That's a call the coaches have to make. They obviously went with what they felt in that regard. I don't think they could have slow played Huhn for another 5-6 months and necessarily been a shoe-in for his commitment. Things have a way of changing in that regard, as it has with Patrick Morris right now.

    As far as overall numbers, I don't think it's a harbinger of total numbers necessarily. It's all about the DB/defensive numbers. We've said Texas had 2 DBs slots, possibly 3, following the departures of AJ White and Eryon Barnett.

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • I can't find a good reason to hate it.

    I trust Akina (even though his track record is not unblemished).
    Huhn has legit size.
    Huhn ran on a 5A finalist 4 x 100 team.
    Attrition is happening and this doesn't seem to close the door on taking a stud DB.
    Huhn seems to be physical and smart (hard hits and didn't bit on misdirection in film).
    Legit offer list.

    Fine by me.

    This post was edited by JKates on 6/4/2012 at 11:51 AM

    Signatures are stupid. You should block them.

    JKates

  • This post is for members of Horns247 only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    mcwast

  • khorn28 said...

    Violence in a S/OLB is something this team needs more of. When Vacarro signed there were some questions about how good of a take he was, but as soon as he got on the field on special teams you could tell that the violence he played with would make him a difference maker. He's developed coverage skills since then, but his suddenness and violence is what makes him special. Hopefully this kid can at least fill that role on special teams.

    True dat...couldn't agree more about playing the game violently. I just posted elsewhere that Huhn reminded me of a bigger John Hagy...another Longhorn from San Antonio who played with bad intentions.

    BagHorn

  • HOOkem4LifE said...

    How many scholly spots do we have left for 2013?

    TBD

    Possibly 1 each at WR, TE, OL, DE, DT and CB. And of course others as attrition/injuries call for.

    This post was edited by BobbyBurton on 6/4/2012 at 12:00 PM

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • This post is for members of Horns247 only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247

    BobbyBurton

  • BobbyBurton said...

    Both fair thoughts IMO.

    As it relates to waiting too long, if you've had them in camp prior to their senior year and you've seen enough, then it comes down to whether or not you think one in hand is worth two in the bush. That's a call the coaches have to make. They obviously went with what they felt in that regard. I don't think they could have slow played Huhn for another 5-6 months and necessarily been a shoe-in for his commitment. Things have a way of changing in that regard, as it has with Patrick Morris right now.

    As far as overall numbers, I don't think it's a harbinger of total numbers necessarily. It's all about the DB/defensive numbers. We've said Texas had 2 DBs slots, possibly 3, following the departures of AJ White and Eryon Barnett.

    Bobby, could he have possibly been taken with a "flex" scholly (meaning possibly a DB or LB scholly depending on how things work out). This concept seems to have really been embraced by the staff last year and worked out well for them instead of rigidly trying to force everyone into a specific slot. We also happen to have, at least, one more LB currently on very thin ice that could add another scholly into the mix.

    BagHorn

  • BobbyBurton said...

    TBD

    Possibly 1 each at TE, OL, DE, DT and CB. And of course others as attrition/injuries call for.

    I say we go hard after Rhodes,Morris,Prevot,Pagano and Luke.

    signature image signature image signature image

    HOOkem4LifE

  • I don't know enough about him to formulate a worthwhile opinion but I do know that OU and UGAs coaches absolutely LOVED this kid. Combine that with the fact this was a DA eval, and I have no issue with the take.

    signature image signature image

    pepper11

  • JKates said...

    I can't find a good reason to hate it. I trust Akina (even though his track record is not unblemished). Huhn has legit size. Huhn ran on a 5A finalist 4 x 100 team. Attrition is happening and this doesn't seem to close the door on taking a stud DB. Huhn seems to be physical and smart (hard hits and didn't bit on misdirection in film). Legit offer list.

    Fine by me.

    This.

    My personal opinion would be incomplete, but his offer list and our defensive coaches jumping on him have me leaning his way.

    The numbers game is just so uncertain right now that I have no idea where the coaches' collective head is on this take.

    I got brains. I got big ol' brains. I got dinosaur brains.

    Bobby_Batronic