-
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
HookemAtl said...
Bobby,
You make some very good points. Unless they are wanting a little more variety in their defensive play calling (zone v man), I have to go for the impression that he will end up as an outside linebacker. Assuming he makes that move, can you compare him to N. Hughes as a linebacker only?
If the coaches are convinced he has the speed to play safety, I will rely on guys like Akina and Diaz who I fully respect and that versatility would be fantastic. But I am just curious about comparing Hughes and Huhn as linebacker prospects.
(my take is that I haven't seen enough of anything on Huhn to make a judgement call either way, hence I'm just asking the question)
Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
NavyHorn28 said...
I like it. I believe he'll be more of a Cobbs type player. The thing I'm worried about is that I've read he gets injured a lot. Even in his highlight video, there's a play where he pops someone, but Huhn is the one that stays on the ground afterwards.
Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
RoosterNTexas ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
779 votes total - (1731)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BobbyBurton said...
First of all, it's not a given that Nashon stays as a greyshirt. We should always keep that in mind.
I think Huhn's more physical than Hughes certainly. And I think straight-line as a blitzer he'll be better than Hughes. What Hughes has is lateral mobility and longer arms.
But Huhn is a different category. He's a guy who can line up over a tight end, have the size, speed and physicality to not be a fish out of water in coverage or against the run. So whether you're playing a 4-3 and he's an OLB or in the nickel, it's really the same sort of hybrid role he's playing.
-
BagHorn said...
The only real question out there is whether or not we needed to offer him in June knowing full well he would immediately jump on the offer and commit? My guess is the timing of this offer indicates the numbers are shaping up to not be quite as tight as originally thought and will have little impact on the other outstanding offers.
Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Horns247 only. Join now! Subscribe Now
-
khorn28 said...
Violence in a S/OLB is something this team needs more of. When Vacarro signed there were some questions about how good of a take he was, but as soon as he got on the field on special teams you could tell that the violence he played with would make him a difference maker. He's developed coverage skills since then, but his suddenness and violence is what makes him special. Hopefully this kid can at least fill that role on special teams.
-
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of Horns247 only. Join now! Subscribe Now
Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/BobbyBurton247
BobbyBurton ●
- 5 stars Rating: 96
20672 votes total - (21363)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BobbyBurton said...
Both fair thoughts IMO.
As it relates to waiting too long, if you've had them in camp prior to their senior year and you've seen enough, then it comes down to whether or not you think one in hand is worth two in the bush. That's a call the coaches have to make. They obviously went with what they felt in that regard. I don't think they could have slow played Huhn for another 5-6 months and necessarily been a shoe-in for his commitment. Things have a way of changing in that regard, as it has with Patrick Morris right now.
As far as overall numbers, I don't think it's a harbinger of total numbers necessarily. It's all about the DB/defensive numbers. We've said Texas had 2 DBs slots, possibly 3, following the departures of AJ White and Eryon Barnett.
-
JKates said...
I can't find a good reason to hate it. I trust Akina (even though his track record is not unblemished). Huhn has legit size. Huhn ran on a 5A finalist 4 x 100 team. Attrition is happening and this doesn't seem to close the door on taking a stud DB. Huhn seems to be physical and smart (hard hits and didn't bit on misdirection in film). Legit offer list.
Fine by me.
I got brains. I got big ol' brains. I got dinosaur brains.
Bobby_Batronic
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2951 votes total - (3124)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4











Do you like the Huhn take?