In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 483
Online now 193 Record: 7224 (2/22/2012)
The place to talk about the Texas Longhorns
The place for off topic discussion on Hookem
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
11.21 and 22.32 in the 100 and 200 respectively
thanks for the numbers br. Will you or someone put this into perspective for folks like me who are ignorant when it comes to track times? i.e. what is considered very fast?
Abraham Hall's 9.74!!! JK I'd say anything under 10.7 FAT and below 21.7 FAT is really outstanding
Kevin Vaccarro ran 21.94 in the 200 at district and has been declared too slow by the naysayers on the board. I don't know if that was wind aided or not.
This post was edited by rozell99 2 years ago
Considering past threads, it was 30 mph wind aided, downhill and they missed marking the finish by 30 meters...
Could be, I wasn't there. Just adding to the discussion with relevant benchmarks.
Since most of us on this board only care about how everything relates to football, an 11.21 second 100 m dash is slow for a senior in high school who is 6'2" 180 lbs. and plays WR.
In my experience the 200 m dash should be slightly less than double a 100 m time, which he ran. This is because the second 100 meters you should already be at top speed. Less than 22 seconds is considered fast.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports